Because labels and publishing companies own my rights I don't ever see how much I actually make per stream. That said, I've heard similar complaints about receiving millions of streams only to make a few hundred dollars. But I totally agree with the point that a stream is like a radio station with a single listener, and is not the same as a single spin on a big station. A lot of musicians don't seem to be able to take that distinction on board. 

That said, I think there is some room to complain about the impact of streaming platforms on the revenue losses in the music industry. To my mind, the problem is that streaming has changed the way we consume music. We are becoming more and more conditioned to stream, rather than buy. The on demand nature of streaming has completely cannibalized album sales.

But one thing that amazes me is that so few musicians are even talking about keeping their music off of the streaming platforms. I think there somewhat of an advantage of being on the streaming platforms, both in the form of income and music discovery, but there is nothing that says we need to put our entire album on Spotify. Nor do we need to make it available right away, when interest is at it's peak.

I think the answer is to "Window" our releases. Initially release an album exclusively through our own website to make maximum profit from the real fan base. Then distribute digitally a few months into the release after sales drop off, but while radio and press is still generating interest. Then release part of the album on the streaming platforms as the album cycle comes to an end. 

The film industry does the same thing with movies. Theaters first, then iTunes and DVD, then cable and TV.

That's my thought on the issue anyway.

Yeah, you touched on it, but as I read his complaint to myself something told me he was probably leaving some important information out. IE, the fact that he likely has a publishing deal, co-writers, etc.

But as far as labels not complaining... I understand the point, but I think that we hear them complaining all the time about the death of album sales. My point was that I think streaming has changed the way we consume music, and that change has lead to the death of mainstream album sales. But yeah, as far as whether or not the revenue share is fair or not, you may be making good points. I'd be curious what your numbers are.

I think streaming is particularly valuable for artists like you who make music that really contributes to the "mood" in a room. It's the kind of stuff people could have on all day. I suspect that there is more potential for random discover with Jazz than some other formats. But regardless, I totally agree that it's a viable revenue stream that shouldn't be ignored, and that it's NOT going anywhere. That said, I do personally think it's had a negative impact on the recording industry, if even just indirectly. Just my two cents.