Hey John,
I Did what you said and had a look in reports to see what was happening with my email link click through rates, and it seems that by the end of the 7 email follow up series i am down to 4% is this normal and if not what can be done to get the click through up? is it as simple as my email copy isnt enticing enough to get people to click through? 5,6,7 are by LTO push and the ones before that are my blog posts.
Thanks
Hey Jordan,
With a list of only 250 your numbers might still be a bit skewed, but taking everything at face value I think those numbers are a bit low. Mine are about double for example.
The bigger concern for me is email 3 and 4 with just 8% and 0%. It's normal to drop in a repetitive LTO. But you want the main content to get better engagement if the LTO is to connect. Because keep in mind with a 4% open rate on your LTO, that means that 60% of your subscribers to make it there are actually buying your music. That number dramatically showcases the need to get those stats up.
Getting those numbers up is a matter of changing the copy. The purpose of the subject line is to get them to open. The purpose of the email copy is to get them to click. The purpose of the content that they click on is to get them to engage. Adjust accordingly.
Having trouble with your marketing? Wish you could have an experienced direct-to-fan marketing expert look over your actual campaigns, music, or content and offer feedback? Or perhaps you’re just looking for a little one-on-one assistance so you can ask questions that pertain to your specific goals and get a second, more experienced, perspective? Click here to book a session with me now.
Hey John thanks for this. I have been through my follow up series and made very minor tweaks. ie.. made sure i posted the link twice and actually told them "click here to read" as before i just had the links posted once and a very subtle kind of "if you want to read it heres the link" kind of direction before, which i'm thinking is a very rookie over sight haha. But other than this i am having some trouble seeing how to make the email content more click batey with out being misleading... to the people who get the email, which i reckon would probably piss them off if i was misleading to get them to click..?
Could you have a look at my emails and see if you can see any glaring mistakes I am making? As you will see, I have used a combination of the email follow up series you provided and stuff of my own. The stuff i used of yours that i hardly changed, is because i thought it was really good and to the point and if i added any more i would just be adding for the sake of it.
would be good to get your take.
Jordan
Hey Jordan,
Correct, you would never want to be misleading. But enticing is a must. There is a fine line between the two.
Going through 5 emails in a single post is a bit of overwhelm, but I did read emails two, three, and four as the problem started AFTER email two.
I had a lot of little thoughts about this word or that word, but above that stuff one thing really stood out to me...
I felt like the language and themes were pretty crass and at best, youthful. From what I remember, you are having the most success targeting an older crowd.
Your second email says "music is like a fart" and then goes on to make your case. I can't speak for your audience but this turned me off. It was just kind of gross. There was also language in email three about "being pissed" all the time, and references to being "awesome" (which is fine but very youthful), and there was a lot of grammar mistakes throughout.
You would probably lose me at "music is like a fart" as well, and that appears to be what has happened.
So my take is that, while you have put a lot of energy into creating ads that connect with an audience, you haven't applied that same filter to your emails.
Unless I'm mistaken and your ads are suddenly connecting with 25 year olds, I would personally overhaul this language to be more gentlemanly, and correct the grammar mistakes. I'm imagining a 45 year old woman seeing your ad and thinking you're a cute guy with a great voice and then suddenly your fart bombing their inbox 🙂 That would be a message to market mismatch.
I hope all of that is taken with the direct, honest, light hearted tone that is intended and not as critical or demotivating.
I'll stress it again though, you know your audience better than I. That is just my impression. What are your thoughts?
Having trouble with your marketing? Wish you could have an experienced direct-to-fan marketing expert look over your actual campaigns, music, or content and offer feedback? Or perhaps you’re just looking for a little one-on-one assistance so you can ask questions that pertain to your specific goals and get a second, more experienced, perspective? Click here to book a session with me now.
Hey Mate,
hahah yeah no worries, i don't get offended mate its all about tweaking and moving forward. I totally understand what you mean. And i hadn't thought of it that way, i guess it was that, as a person i am a little cheeky and in person that comes off well with the older folk but maybe as you pointed out its a little harder for that to come across cheeky and charming whilst only in text..?
And yes now that you pointed it out i guess the language i am using is pretty youthful and as far as the grammar and spelling i guess some people in this higher age range get pretty annoyed by bad spelling and grammar, so yeah i see this as a potential jumping off point.... my mum is always giving me shit about my spelling hahah
I will give this all a crack and see how we go...
As for the LTO offer emails is there anything in those that you could suggest doing to get that click through up? As the personalised youthful style isnt really in these i don't feel and yet the click through is still down but the open rate is still in the high 30%. Because as you pointed out... im only getting a 4% click through rate on those emails and i have a 2.5% conversion rate so its just a matter of getting that 4% up.
But yeah these LTO Emails are pretty direct and to the point whilst still being polite so yeah i was a little stumped with how to modify these ones.
Thanks again
Jordan
Cool. Glad you didn't take offense. I'm a ridiculously bad speller myself and I'm a paid writer. So I hear ya. But I think it's important based on your demographic.
My concern would be that you are turning some of the people off early in the funnel and so your engagement is down by the end of it. Point being, it's usually the email BEFORE the one with the bad stats that I look to for the problem. That big drop in opens after email #2 looks to me like you are loosing them between email #1 and #2. But those that you don't lose convert well.
To my mind, (based on what you've told me about your demo), you have an audience of older women who get a great vibe from your image, vibe, and sound. What I feel from your emails is quite different. You seem "sweet" in the ads but like a bit of a hooligan in the emails (at least to me). I have no doubt that you make that work in person. But I don't think it's working in these emails. It's really key that any successful brand be consistent. If you want to be cheeky then start off cheeky and reflect that in your ads, imagery, and targeting. If you want to be sweet, then be sweet throughout. Right now it's like going on the first date with the really well mannered guy and then finding that he's actually a bit rude on the second date... if that makes any sense. If you had been cheeky from the start then the people that connected with you initially would still feel connected.
I can't guarantee that this will solve your problem, but this is what I would address first.
Having trouble with your marketing? Wish you could have an experienced direct-to-fan marketing expert look over your actual campaigns, music, or content and offer feedback? Or perhaps you’re just looking for a little one-on-one assistance so you can ask questions that pertain to your specific goals and get a second, more experienced, perspective? Click here to book a session with me now.